Thursday, March 24, 2011

How Ethnocentricity Inducts Conflict




When the British chose to colonize the Australian land inhabited by the Aboriginals, their ethnocentric perspective towards the natives instigated conflict between the two communities. Initially, due to the close relationship formed between Governor Phillip and the Aboriginal Bennelong, the relationship between the two cultures was strong. Unfortunately, due to the murder of many Aboriginals by the whites, conflict arose. Since the British were more advanced when it came to strategy and weaponry, they were able to overpower the Aboriginals, and manipulate them. The Europeans tended to view the Aboriginals as animals, without rights. They were perceived as savages. These beliefs were not simply prompted by the dark skin of the natives, but rather their culture. Aboriginal people believed in the legends of the earth, and in respecting the traditions of their ancestors. With this strong belief, the natives didn’t concern themselves with clothes, and weren’t as driven by ambition as the whites. To the British, man was meant to strive for greatness, instead of being content with the natural world. As seen in the book “The Rabbits”, the ‘whites’ originally came to the native land with a more developed understanding of the world, and were able to take advantage of the inexperience of the indigenous people. “Still more of them came, sometimes we had fights-”. They soon colonized more and more people, and made it clear that they planned to take control. Since the British viewed themselves as superior to the Aboriginals, they chose not to take the Aboriginals' beliefs or feelings into account. They saw the natives as ‘barbarous’ and ‘ferocious’, and viewed them as sub-human, without genuine emotions. This was a great contributor to their drive and longing to wipe out the native ‘breed’. They didn’t want to attempt to understand or appreciate the native lifestyle, because they assumed only their 'way' was right, and all mankind should reach their 'standards'. The British chose ignorance. They rarely made attempts to learn about the Aboriginals. Instead, they gradually eradicated the culture. After failing to remove the Aboriginal nature from Bennelong, they decided that no natives could become ‘civilized’. This developed a negative stigma towards the Aboriginals, resulting in barely any whites attempting to reach out to the culture. The British simply continued to spread around Australia, ruthlessly snatching Aboriginal lands, even replacing the native crops. Many became merciless. Men, women, and children were slaughtered in order to prevent the continuing growth of the Aboriginal population. Whenever natives, such as Windradyne, attempted to fight back, the whites responded by butchering more and more innocent people. Instead of searching for a civil solution, the two cultures continued to tear each other apart. The British refused to respect or value the Aboriginals' rich culture. They not only stole and destroyed the lives of many, but they also spread an addiction to alcohol throughout an entire generation of people. Ultimately, not once ounce of positivity was seized from the experience. Children were stolen, lives were taken, and a culture began to deteriorate. If only the British had initially viewed the Aboriginal culture with a sense of humanity or civility, a massive amount of lives could have been spared. A rich culture might have been greatly preserved. No good can come from an ethnocentric mindset, as is seen throughout the history of Australia.


Thursday, February 24, 2011

Marc Antony's Speech


Context

-->
Before Marc Antony speaks to the people, Brutus gives a speech to the plebeians in order to defend his actions, and introduces Antony as one of the conspirators' allies. After Brutus leaves, Antony begins to present a speech to the people of Rome, in order to get them to rise against the conspirators.

Meaning and Significance
-->
Marc Antony's speech to the crowd is one of the most vital scenes of the entire play, because it is the birth of a new conflict. The audience had been focused on whether the conspirators were going to kill Caesar, and once the assassination was complete, Shakespeare needed to steer the play into a different direction. He heaved the fickle nature of the plebeians to an entirely new level, by making them gradually turn against Brutus, and doubt his renowned ‘honor’. We are also reintroduced to Antony, as he is revealed to be a worthy and formidable threat. Shakespeare employed the powerful words and emotions of Marc Antony to aim the people against the conspirators. Through the effectiveness of Antony's speech, the play with be focused on the aftermath of the conspiracy, and we are left to speculate the fate of our honorable Brutus, and question whether Caesar was genuinely the antagonist of the play.


Act 3 scene 2 (lines 74 - 105)

-->

Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest--
For Brutus is an honorable man;
So are they all, all honorable men--
Come I to speak in Caesar's funeral.
He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honorable man.
He hath brought many captives home to Rome
Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill:
Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?
When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honorable man.
You all did see that on the Lupercal
I thrice presented him a kingly crown,
Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;
And, sure, he is an honorable man.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love him once, not without cause:
What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?
O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;
My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,
And I must pause till it come back to me.



Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Profile K Evaluation


Today in class Mr. Whiting came in and talked to us about the two hemispheres of our brain: Logic and Gestalt. If someone relies more on the left side of their brain to process information, they are logically centered, and if they rely on the right side of their brain more, they are considered Gestalt. Those who are logical tend to prefer having instruction, work in a neat, sequential matter, and tend to direct their focus towards details. Those which are Gestalt tend to work in a more abstract way, tend to be more curious, and focus on the big picture, without paying so much attention to details.

Through a few forms of testing our brains, I was able to reaffirm that I am a Gestalt person, who is a Profile K Learner (I got the exact same results when doing the same testing in 7th grade).


I learn best when I am given examples of how to do things, as I have trouble following step by step instructions. I prefer not to be told exactly how to apply my thinking, because I feel as though it is restricting me. An example of this would be when writing an essay. I prefer it when I am given an example, and then am able to let my imagination take control of what I am writing. I dislike being given formatting and being told how I am supposed to do things. I use the ‘whole’, and then work with parts of the whole.


Whenever doing work or learning about a new subject, I need to be able to relate to what I am doing in an emotional level, or else I have trouble when attempting to deeply process any sort of information. For Example: When reading Julius Caesar, I was able to understand the protagonist (Brutus), because I understood what it meant to be unsure whether to trust your friends, and how easily even the smartest of people can be manipulated through the use of heavy flattery. Since I was able to relate to the story, I could comprehend the vulnerability of Brutus. Then, I place myself into his mind, and understand the emotions that are provoking his choices.


The strategies that would help me in my learning are to use visuals and constantly change the topic of discussion. Whenever working on a project or learning a new subject, I consistently turn to the use of images, pictures, and diagrams, because they allow me to clearly see the information I am trying to process. I also prefer not having to remain on one subject or topic, because I lose focus. By constantly changing the subject, I come up with new ideas, and am able to exercise my imagination and creativity.


I would like my teachers to know that I prefer being able to debate and have discussions in smaller groups, because it not only allows for my voice to be heard, but I am also able to hear everyone else’s opinions in detail. This not only shares my thoughts to other people, but I am able to see things from a variety of perspectives, and it will expand my thinking.


http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/4128/PreviewComp/SuperStock_4128R-1289.jpg